<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Myth of &quot;Win-Win&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dennisfassett.com/2007/11/21/41/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dennisfassett.com/2007/11/21/41/</link>
	<description>Cash Flow Real Estate Investing, Training, Coaching, and Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.dennisfassett.com/2007/11/21/41/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michprops.com/blog/2007/11/21/41/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>In the paragraph-

&#039;And the reason is plain and simple – because real estate, and life, are both zero-sum games. What that means in simple terms is that if you and I participate in a transaction as buyer and seller, you can’t make a dollar unless I lose one. And I can’t make a dollar unless you lose one. It’s that simple. Somebody wins. Somebody loses. That’s capitalism.&#039;

I hope you are just referring to the banks losing and not Capitalism in general. Because when a dollar is exchanged you are trading value for value. 1 dollar for goods or services. That is how we gauge prices.

Money is stored production.

A lot of people think prices are an arbitrary number and don&#039;t realize it&#039;s a tool. An instant indicator of value.

Usually in the system of free trade both people win. Wealth CAN be created. Does not a plot of land grow in value when someone builds a house on it, and in turn the value of his neighbors grows?

I&#039;m not saying there is not the occasional loss of value in a transaction, but if it were the rule and not the very rare exception on a massive scale, it would result in a classic example of the &quot;Law of diminishing returns.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the paragraph-</p>
<p>&#8216;And the reason is plain and simple – because real estate, and life, are both zero-sum games. What that means in simple terms is that if you and I participate in a transaction as buyer and seller, you can’t make a dollar unless I lose one. And I can’t make a dollar unless you lose one. It’s that simple. Somebody wins. Somebody loses. That’s capitalism.&#8217;</p>
<p>I hope you are just referring to the banks losing and not Capitalism in general. Because when a dollar is exchanged you are trading value for value. 1 dollar for goods or services. That is how we gauge prices.</p>
<p>Money is stored production.</p>
<p>A lot of people think prices are an arbitrary number and don&#8217;t realize it&#8217;s a tool. An instant indicator of value.</p>
<p>Usually in the system of free trade both people win. Wealth CAN be created. Does not a plot of land grow in value when someone builds a house on it, and in turn the value of his neighbors grows?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying there is not the occasional loss of value in a transaction, but if it were the rule and not the very rare exception on a massive scale, it would result in a classic example of the &#8220;Law of diminishing returns.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

